Analysis of coastal vulnerability of Rangsang Island due to climate changes
Rangsang Island is home to more than 48,000 residents. Climate change has been a critical issue to the Island and threatened the existence of the inhabitants. This study is proposed to identify the zone of the coastal area of Rangsang Island which is vulnerable to climate change. By mapping coastal vulnerability index (CVI) of the island, it is expected to be a reference of local government in planning their spatial management. The method of this study was by a direct survey for collecting data of geomorphology, beach elevation, sea level rise, tidal fluctuation, significant wave height, and changes in the coastline. To determine CVI, each parameter is divided into 5 categories and given a value level: 1 for very not vulnerable, 2 for not vulnerable, 3 for moderate, 4 for vulnerable, and 5 for very vulnerable. The results show that most villages on the island are classified as highly vulnerable to climate change, namely 9 villages. Even 2 villages are threatened very high risk because the village has CVI more than 12.5. Only 6 villages whose territory has moderate vulnerability index. Vulnerability level of coastal Rangsang Island is strongly influenced by geomorphological variable and coastal elevation. In addition, the variable coastline changes and sea level rise also contributed to the vulnerability index of the Island.
BPS (Indonesian Statistics). 2018. Regional statistics of Kepulauan Meranti regency in 2018. Selatpanjang: BPS Kabupaten Kepulauan Meranti (in Indonesian).
Gornitz, V. 1991. Global coastal hazards from future sea level rise. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology (Global and Planetary Change Section) 89: 379-398.
Halim, Halili, and Afu, L.O.A. 2016. Studying the changes of coastal line by applying remote sensing approach along the coastal Areas of Soropia Subdistrict. Jurnal Sapa Laut 1(1): 24-31 (in Indonesian).
Kumar, A.A. and Kunte, P.D. 2012. Coastal vulnerability assessment for Chennai, east coast of India using geospatial techniques. Natural Hazards 64: 853–872.
Kumar, T.S., Mahendra, R.S., Nayak, S., Radhakrishnan, K. and Sahu, K.C. 2010. Coastal Vulnerability Assessment for Orissa State, East Coast of India. Journal of Coastal Research 23(3): 523–534.
Nash, S. and Hartnett, M. 2014. Development of a nested coastal circulation model: boundary error reduction. Environmental Modelling and Software 53: 65-80.
Pariwono, J.I. 1989. Driving force of tides. Puslitbang Oseanologi LIPI. Jakarta, Indonesia. pp. 13-23 (in Indonesian).
PODAAC (Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center). 2018. Available at https://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/
Ramieri, E, Hartley, A., Barbanti, A., Duarte Santos, F., Gomes, A., Hilden, M., Laihonen, P., Marinova, N. and Santini, M. 2011. Methods for assessing coastal vulnerability to climate change, European Topic Centre on Climate Change Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptation (ETC CCA) Technical Paper, Bologna (IT) 93, October 2011.
Sprintall, J., Wijffels, S.E., Molcard, R. and Jaya I. 2009. Direct estimation of the Indonesian throughflow entering the Indian Ocean: 2004-2006. Journal of Geophysical Research. 114:1-9.
Szlafsztein, C. and Sterr, H. 2007. A GIS-based vulnerability assessment of coastal natural hazards, state of Pará, Brazil. Journal of Coastal Conservation 11:53–66.
Thieler, E.R. and Hammar-Klose, E.S. 2000. National Assessment of Coastal Vulnerability to Sea-Level Rise: U.S. Pacific Coast. U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 00-178.
Wyrtki, K. 1961. Physical Oceanography of the Southeast Asian waters, Scientific Results ofvMarine Investigations of the South China Sea and the Gulf of Thailand 1959-1961, NAGA Report Vol. 2: 17-28.
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.