The possibility of reclamation criteria success in Indonesia: soil condition, vegetation structure and species composition


  • Tedi Yunanto Bandung Polytechnic of Energy and Mines, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources
  • Farisatul Amanah Directorate General Mineral and Coal, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources
  • Nabila Putri Wisnu Bandung Polytechnic of Energy and Mines, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources



mining, reclamation criteria, soil condition, species composition, vegetation structure


There are two regulations for mine reclamation success in the forestry area in Indonesia, namely Minister of Forestry Regulation No. P.60/Menhut-II/2009 and Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Decree No. 1827.K/30/MEM/2018. Both regulations rule vegetation and soil success. This study aims to analyse criteria parameters from both regulations in the mine reclamation and compare them to the surrounding secondary natural forest (SNF). This study was conducted in 6 six types of mine reclamation stand structures: 1, 4, 6, 9, 11-year-old plantation and SNF using 1 hectare of the circular plot each (total 6 ha). Soil samples were collected from 40 cm depth to analyse physical, biological and chemical conditions. Mine reclamation areas had almost similar physical, biological and chemical soil conditions with SNF. Nevertheless, due to the potential acid-forming (PAF) material from overburden, the 1-year-old plantation had pH = 3.23-3.27. The highest diversity index and the number of species and families in all reclamation areas were H’ = 1.82 (11-year-old); 14 species (9-year-old); and 11 families (9-year-old), comparing with SNF were H’ = 3.48; 67 species, and 31 families. Conversely, vegetation structure parameters in mine reclamation areas were higher than SNF (diameter at height breast (DBH; 1.3 m) = 28.42 cm; tree density = 469/ha; basal area = 35.04 m2/ha; and total height = 16.85 m). Compared to the SNF, vegetation structure and soil conditions are mostly possible for mine reclamation success. Still, species composition needs to be considered further as a standard interval to meet the criteria.


Amanah, F. and Yunanto, T. 2019. Mine reclamation period to successfully meet criteria in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure. 3-5 September 2019. Perth, Australia. p. 1303-1314.

Barrientos-Ramírez, L., Vargas-Radillo, J.J., Segura-Nieto, M., Manriquez-Gonzalez, R. and Toral, F.A. 2015. Nutritional evaluation of mature seeds of Enterolobium cyclocarpum (parota) from diverse ecological zones in western Mexico. BOSQUE 36: 95-103, doi:10.4067/s0717-92002015000100010.

Brodbeck, F. 2004. Structure and Processes in Traditional Forest Gardens of Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Cuvillier Verlag Göttingen. Göttingen, Germany. 212p.

Doupé, R.G. and Lymbery, A.J. 2005. Environmental risks associated with beneficial end uses of mine lakes in Southwestern Australia. Mine Water and the Environment 24:134-138, doi:10.1007/s10230-005-0084-0.

Dutta, M., Saikia, J., Taffarel, S.R., Waanders, F.B., de Medeiros, D., Cutruneo, C.M.N.L., Silva, L.F.O. and Saikia, B.K. 2017. Environmental assessment and nano-mineralogical characterization of coal, overburden and sediment from Indian coal mining acid drainage. Geoscience Frontiers 8(6):1285-1297, doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2016.11.014.

James, F.C. and Shugart, H.H. 1970. A quantitive method of habitat description. National Audubon Society: Field Notes 24(6): 727-736.

Kurinobu, S., Prehatin, D., Mohammad, N., Matsune, K. and Chigira, O. 2007. A provisional growth model with a size–density relationship for a plantation of Paraserianthes falcataria derived from measurements taken over 2 years in Pare, Indonesia. Journal of Forest Research 12(3):230-236, doi:10.1007/s10310-007-0007-y.

Lamprecht, H. 1989. Silviculture in the Tropics. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit. Eschborn, Rossdorf, Germany. 296p.

Lloyd, M.V., Doherty, M.D., Jeffree, R.A., John, J., Majer, J.D., Osborne, J.M. and Nichols, O.G. 2002. Managing the Impacts of the Australian Minerals Industry on Biodiversity. Australian Centre for Mining Environmental. London, UK. 120p.

Lu, Y. 1999. Development of Models for Sustainable Management of the Mixed Tropical Rain. Dissertation University of Göttingen. Verlag Enrich Goltze GmbH & Co. KG. Göttingen, Germany.

Magurran, A.A. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Springer. Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 179p.

Martin, J. and Gower, T. 1996. Forest succession. Forestry Facts: 78-81.

Moffat, A.J. 1995. Minimum soil depths for the establishment of woodland on disturbed ground. Arboricultural Journal 19: 19-27.

Slingenberg, A., Braat, L., Windt, H., Rademaekers, K., Eichler, L. and Turner, K. 2009. Study on Understanding the Causes of Biodiversity Loss and the Policy Assessment Framework. ECORYS Nederland BV. Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Sofyan, R.H., Wahjunie, E.D. and Hidayat, Y. 2017. Physical characterization and soil moisture at different reclamation’s age of mined land. Buletin Tanah dan Lahan 1(1):72-78 (in Indonesian).

Subowo, G. 2011. Environment friendly open pit mining systems and reclamation post-mining efforts to improve the quality of land resources and soil biodiversity. Jurnal Sumber Daya Lahan 5 (2): 83-94 (in Indonesian)..

Suharno and Sancayaningsih, R. P. 2013. Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Fungi: The potential use of heavy metal mycorrhizo-remediation technology in mined field rehabilitation. Bioteknologi 10(1):23-34, doi:10.13057/biotek/c100104 (in Indonesian).

Supriyanto and Irawan, U.S. 2001. Technique for Measuring Canopy Cover and Canopy Opening Using a Spherical Densiometer. Laboratorium Silvikultur SEAMEO-BIOTROP. Bogor, Indonesia (in Indonesian)

Yunanto, T. 2018. Site and Vegetation Development After Coal Mine Reclamation in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Cuvillier Verlag. Göttingen, Germany. 272p.








How to Cite

Yunanto, T., Amanah, F., & Wisnu, N. P. (2021). The possibility of reclamation criteria success in Indonesia: soil condition, vegetation structure and species composition. Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management, 9(1), 3201–3210.



Research Article