Article Tools
Email this article (Login required)
Email the author (Login required)
About The Authors

Fajar Yulianto
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3084-6694
Remote Sensing Application Center, LAPAN
Indonesia

S Suwarsono
Remote Sensing Application Center, LAPAN
Indonesia

Taufik Maulana
Remote Sensing Application Center, LAPAN
Indonesia

Muhammad Rokhis Khomarudin
Remote Sensing Application Center, LAPAN
Indonesia

User
Information for Author
Visitor Statistic

The dynamics of shoreline change analysis based on the integration of remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) techniques in Pekalongan coastal area, Central Java, Indonesia

Fajar Yulianto, S Suwarsono, Taufik Maulana, Muhammad Rokhis Khomarudin
  J. Degrade. Min. Land Manage. , pp. 1789-1802  
Viewed : 284 times

Abstract


Coastal areas are found in the dynamic zone at the interface between the three major natural systems of the Earth's surface. The phenomenon of shoreline change is one of the most frequent problems encountered in the coastal environment and is caused by natural processes that result in dynamic changes in the coastal area. Coastal area change can affect the vulnerability of the coastal environment and its properties, such as shoreline stabilization, flood control, sediment retention, natural protection and others. The method of integrating remote sensing data with geographic information system (GIS) techniques has been widely used to monitor and analyze the dynamics of shoreline change in coastal areas. The purpose of this study is to map and analyze the dynamics of shoreline change from 1978 to 2017 in the study area. An approach combining spectral value index and visual interpretation of Landsat images was used and proposed to indicate the separation of land and water bodies, for shoreline extraction. The normalized difference water index (NDWI) can be used as a spectral value index approach for differentiating land and water bodies. Furthermore, the analysis of shoreline changes was performed using the digital shoreline analysis system (DSAS). Based on calculations made using DSAS, it can be seen that the pattern of coastline change tends to be dominated by offshore erosion. The results of this study may also be important as input data for coastal hazard assessment as part of the effort to overcome the problem of flood tides.


Keywords


dynamics of shoreline change; GIS; remote sensing; tidal flood

Full Text:

PDF

References


Addo, K.A., Jayson, Q.P.N. and Kufogbe, K.S. 2011. Quantitative analysis of shoreline change using medium resolution satellite imagery in Keta, Ghana. Marine Science 1(1):1-9. DOI: 10.5923/j.ms.20110101.01.

Allen, T.R. 2012. Estimating coastal lagoon tidal flooding and repletion with multidate ASTER thermal imagery. Remote Sensing, 4:3110-3126. DOI:10.3390/rs4103110.

Bird, E.C.F. and Ongkosongo, O.S.R. 1980. Environmental changes on the coasts of Indonesia. The United Nations University: United Nations University Press.

Bonetti, J., Henrique, A., da Fountoura, K., Mariela, M., Clarissa, B., Guilherme, V., Tolda, Jr.E.E. and Mauricio, G. 2013. Spatial and numerical methodologies on coastal erosion and flooding risk. Coastal Hazards, Research Library 6:423-442.

Brown, N., Nicholls, R.J., Collin, D.W., Hanson, S., Hinkel, J., Kebede, A.S., Neumann, B. and Vafieds, T.A. 2013. Seal level rise impacts and responses: a global perspective. Coastal Hazards, Research Library, 6:117-149.

Burningham, H. and French, J. 2017. Understanding coastal change using shoreline trend analysis supported by cluster-based segmentation. Geomorphology 282:131-149.

Carrasco, A.R., Ferreira, Ó., Matias, A. and Freire, P. 2012. Natural and human-induced coastal dynamics at a back-barrier beach. Geomorphology 159/160:30-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.03.001.

Chalabi, A., Mohd-Lokman, H., Mohd-Suffian, I., Karamali, K., Karthigeyan, V. and Masita, M. 2006. Monitoring shoreline change using Ikonos image and aerial photographs: a case study of Kuala Terengganu area, Malaysia. (ISPRS Mid-term Symposium Proceeding. May 2006, Enschede).

Chavez, P.S.Jr. 1988. An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data. Remote Sensing Environmental24:459–479.

Condon, W.H., Pardyanto L., Ketner, K.B., Amin, T.C., Gafoer, S. and Samodra, H. 1996. Geological map scale 1:100.000 sheet Banjarnegara-Pekalongan. Second edition. Center for Geological Research and Development.

Ekercin, S. 2007. Coastline change assessment at the Aegean sea coasts in Turkey using multitemporal landsat imagery. Journal of Coastal Research 23(3):691 – 698.

Erener, A. and Yakar, M. 2012. Monitoring coastline change using remote sensing and GIS technologies. International Conference on Earth Science and Remote Sensing Lecture Notes in Information Technology.

Erkkilä, A. and Kalliola, R. 2004. Patterns and dynamics of coastal waters in multi-temporal satellite images: support to water quality monitoring in the Archipelago Sea, Finland. Estuarine. Coastal and Shelf Science 60(2):165-177.

Gao, B.C. 1996. NDWI - A Normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sensing Environmental 58:257-266.

Hackney, C., Darby, S.E. and Leyland, J. 2013. Modelling the response of soft cliffs to climate change: A statistical, process-response model using accumulated excess energy. Geomorphology 187:108-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.01.005.

Kaichang, D., Ruijing, M., Jue, W. and Ron, L. 2004. Coastal mapping and change diction using high-resolution IKONOS satellite imagery. http://shoreline.eng.ohio-state.edu/ research/diggov/DigiGov.html.

Kuleli, T., Guneroglu, A., Karsli, F. and Dihkan, M. 2011. Automatic detection of shoreline change on coastal Ramsar wetlands of Turkey. Ocean Engineering 38(10):1141-1149.

Li, X. and Damen, M.C.J. 2010. Coastline change detection with satellite remote sensing for environmental management of the Pearl River Estuary, China. Journal of Marine Systems 82: S54–S61.

Marfai, M.A. and King, L. 2007. Monitoring land subsidence in Semarang, Indonesia. Environmental Geology 53:651-659. DOI:10.1007/s00254-007-0680-3.

Marfai, M.A., Almohammad, H., Dey, S., Susanto, B. and King, L. 2007. Coastal dynamic and shoreline mapping: multi-sources spatial data analysis in Semarang Indonesia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 142(1-3):297-308. DOI:10.1007/s10661-007-9929-2.

McFeeters, S.K. 1996. The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. International Journal of Remote Sensing 17:1425–1432.

McFeeters, S.K. 2013. Using the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) within a Geographic Information System to detect swimming pools for mosquito abatement: a practical approach. Remote Sensing 5:3544–3561.

Memon, A.A., Muhammad, S., Rahman, S. and Haq, M. 2015. Flood monitoring and damage assessment using water indices: A case study of Pakistan flood - 2012. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences 18:99–106.

Mills, J.P., Buckley, S.J., Mitchell, H.L., Clarke, P.J. and Edwards, S.J. 2005. A geomatics data integration technique for coastal change monitoring. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 30:651–664.

NASA 2011. Landsat 7 science data users handbook. Maryland: Landsat Project Science Office at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt.

Oyedotun, T.D.T. 2014. Shoreline geometry: DSAS as a tool for historical trend analysis. Geomorphological Techniques, Chap. 3, Sec. 2.2. ISSN 2047-0371

Ozdarici, A. and Turker, M. 2006. Comparison of different spatial resolution images for parcel-based crop mapping. (ISPRS Mid-term Symposium Proceeding. May 2006, Enschede).

Rio, L.D., Gracia, J.F. and Benavente, J. 2013. Shoreline change patterns in sandy coasts. A case study in SW Spain. Geomorphology, 196:252-266. DOI:10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.07.027.

Shalaby, A. and Tateishi, R. 2007. Remote sensing and GIS for mapping and monitoring land cover and land-use changes in the Northwestern coastal zone of Egypt. Applied Geography 27(1):28-41.

Thébaudeau, B., Trenhaile, A.S. and Edwards, R.J. 2013. Modelling the development of rocky shoreline profiles along the northern coast of Ireland. Geomorphology 203:66-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.03.027.

Thieler, E.R., Himmelstoss, E.A., Zichichi, J.L. and Ayhan, E. 2017. Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) version 4.0 — An ArcGIS extension for calculating shoreline change (ver.4.4, July 2017): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1278.

Thomas, T., Rangel-Buitrago, N., Phillips, M.R., Anfuso, G. and Williams, A.T. 2015. Mesoscale morphological change, beach rotation and storm climate influences along a macrotidal embayed beach. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 3:1006-1026.

USGS 2013a. Landsat missions: frequently asked questions about the Landsat missions US Geological Survey. Last modified: 5/30/123. Landsat.usgs.gov.

USGS 2013b. Using the US Geological Survey Landsat 8 product. Last modified: 5/30/123. Landsat7.usgs.gov.

Xiaodong, Z., Ya, G.J. and Deren, L. 2006. A strategy of change detection based on remotely sensed imagery and GIS data. ISPRS Mid-term Symposium Proceeding, Enschede.

Yulianto, F., Prasasti, I., Pasaribu, J.M., Fitriana, H.L., Zylshal, Haryani, N.S. and Sofan, P. 2016. The dynamics of land use/land cover change modeling and their implication for the flood damage assessment in the Tondano watershed, North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Modeling Earth System Environmental 2:47. DOI:10.1007/s40808-016-0100-3.

Zhao, B., Guo, H., Yan, Y., Wang, Q. and Li, B. 2008. A simple waterline approach for tidelands using multi-temporal satellite images: A case study in the Yangtze Delta. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 77(1):134-142.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Indexed By