Geophysical methods reveal a subsurface historic wastewater tunnel exposed by a sinkhole: a case study in Bandung City, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15243/jdmlm.2025.122.7265Keywords:
electrical resistivity, geophysical method, ground-penetrating radar, tomography, water tunnelAbstract
Bandung City, the capital of West Java Province in Indonesia, has changed its physical face rapidly due to the many constructions of office buildings, hotels, and other facilities until now. To avoid the instability of existing buildings and for building construction in the future, knowledge of the subsurface conditions in the city must be enhanced. A sudden soil collapse in the yard of the PAG Building occurred in early 2018 and resulted in a sinkhole with a diameter of 5 m, which revealed a historic wastewater tunnel structure in the subsurface. Non-invasive, low-cost, and time-effective geophysical methods to solve those problems are proposed. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT), widely applied to identify artificial objects underground, came to be used for these purposes. A research to know the suitability of both methods for application began with numerical simulation, followed by field measurement on 4 GPR and ERT lines and analysis of each method. The results show that GPR data, through both numerical and field data, could identify and locate the tunnel in a radargram due to its hyperbola shape, whereas ERT data provided the property contrast between the tunnel and its host. The results suggest that GPR and ERT techniques are effective for revealing water tunnels in the study area with a maximum depth of 1.8 m and a 65% reduction in size. These findings can be used as a guide to using both methods to reveal the water tunnel network in the central part of Bandung City for sustainable urban planning.
References
Abdullah, F.M.S., Al-Shuhail, A.A. and Sanuade, O.A. 2019. Characterization of Subsurface cavities using gravity and ground penetrating radar. Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics 24(2):265-276. https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG24.2.265
Abu-Shariah, M.I.I. 2009. Determination of cave geometry by using a geometrical resistivity inverse model. Engineering Geology 105:239-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.02.006
Allred, B.J. 2013. A GPR agricultural drainage pipe detection case study: Effects of antenna orientation relative to drainage pipe directional trend. Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics 18:55-69. https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG18.1.55
Alsharahi, G., Faize, A., Louzazni, M., Mostapha, A.M.M., Bayjja, M. and Driouach, A. 2019. Detection of cavities and fragile areas by numerical methods and GPR application. Journal of Applied Geophysics 164:225-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.03.007
Bahri, S., Tualepe, D., Batlolona, Y.T., Ramadhan, A. and Parnadi, W.W. 2024. Vertical electrical sounding method and Dar Zarrouk analysis to identify the distribution of seawater intrusion in Pelauw Village, Maluku. Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management 11(4):6089-6097. https://doi.org/10.15243/jdmlm.2024.114.6089
Beres, M. and Haeni, F.P. 1991. Application of ground-penetrating-radar methods in hydrogeologic studies. Groundwater 29(3):375-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1991.tb00528.x
Borgatti, L., Forte, E., Mocnik, A., Zambrini, R., Cervi, F., Martinucci, D., Pellegrini, F., Pillon, S., Prizzon, A. and Zamariolo, A. 2017. Detection and characterization of animal burrows within river embankments by means of coupled remote sensing and geophysical techniques: Lessons from River Panaro (northern Italy). Engineering Geology 226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.06.017
Boubaki, N., Saintenoy, A. and Tucholka, P. 2011. GPR profiling and electrical resistivity tomography for buried cavity detection: a Test site at the Abbaye de l’Ouye (France). IEEE Xplore, 6th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR). https://doi.org/10.1109/IWAGPR.2011.5963852
Dahlin, T. and Zhou, B. 2004. A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays. Geophysical Prospecting 52:379-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00423.x
Dai, Z., Zhang, M. and Gu, J. 2022. GPR forward modelling and imaging analysis for boulder detection. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering 46:3193-3202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00804-7
Daryono, M.R., Natawidjaja, D.H., Sapiie, B. and Cummins, P. 2019, Earthquake geology of the Lembang fault, West Java, Indonesia. Tectonophysics 751:180-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2018.12.014
Dewantara, D. and Parnadi, W.W. 2022. Automatic hyperbola detection and apex extraction using convolutional neural network on GPR data. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2243:012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2243/1/012027
Diallo, M.C., Cheng, L.Z., Rosa, E., Gunther, C. and Chouteau, M. 2019. Integrated GPR and ERT data interpretation for bedrock identification at Clericy, Quebec, Canada. Engineering Geology 248:230-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.09.011
Junaid, M., Abdullah, R.A., Saa’ri, R., Alel, M., Ali, W. and Ullah, A. 2019. Recognition of boulder in granite deposit using integrated borehole and 2D electrical resistivity imaging for effective mine planning and development. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Malaysia 67:99-104. https://doi.org/10.7186/bgsm67201912
Loke, M.H. 2014. Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys. www.geoelectrical.com.
Niwas, S., Tezkan, B. and Israil, M. 2011. Aquifer hydraulic conductivity estimation from surface geoelectrical measurements for Krauthausen test site, Germany. Hydrogeology Journal 19:307-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-010-0689-7
Nobes, D.C. 2022. Imaging indigenous sacred sites: A tale of clay, silt, and sand. Geophysics 87(1): WA27-WA38. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2021-0062.1
Nobes, D.C. and Atekwana, E. 2018. Pitfalls in near-surface geophysical interpretation: Challenging paradigms and misconceptions. Interpretation 6(4):SL1–SL9. https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2017-0104.1
Pambudi, R.A., Chrisnawan, T.S., Warsa, W., Laesanpura, A. and Parnadi, W.W. 2022. Implementation of frequency characteristics technique in Ground-Penetrating Radar to identify steam vent. Proceedings of 4th South East Asian Conference on Geophysics, Bandung, 09-11 August 2022.
Parnadi, W.W., Warsa, W., Laesanpura, A. and Santoso, D. 2021. Multi frequency Ground-Penetrating Radar method for mapping underground pipes and man-made objects. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 873: 012090. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/873/1/012090
Prego, F.J., Solla, M., Puente, L. and Arias, P. 2017. Efficient GPR data acquisition to detect underground pipes. NDT and E International 91:22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.06.002
Priska, A., Parnadi, W.W. and Parnadi R.G. 2019. On the application of multi-frequency Ground-Penetrating Radar method for mapping underground pipe. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 318:012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/318/1/01202
Sandmeier, K.J. 2008. Reflexw version 5.0. GPR and Seismic Processing Softwater [Computer software]: Sandmeier Geophysical research software, Karsruhe, Germany.
Sanuade, O.A., Amosun, J.O., Oyeyemi, K.D., Olaojo, A.A., Fagbemigun, T.S. and Faloyo, J.I. 2019, Analysis of principles of equivalence and suppression in resistivity sounding technique. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1299:012065. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1299/1/012065
Sass, O., Bell, R. and Glade, T. 2008. Comparison of GPR, 2D-resistivity and traditional techniques for the subsurface exploration of the Öschingen landslide, Swabian Alb (Germany). Geomorphology 93:89-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.12.019
Sudha, K., Israil, M., Mittal, and Rai, S.J. 2009. Soil characterization using electrical resistivity tomography and geotechnical investigations. Journal of Applied Geophysics 74-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.09.012
Suhari, S. and Siebenhuner, M. 1993. Environmental geology for land use and regional planning in the Bandung Basin, West Java, Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences 8:557-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-9547(93)90053-R
Tarigan, A.K.M., Sagala, S., Samsura, D.A.A., Fiisabiilillah, D., Simarmata, H.A. and Nababan, M. 2016. City Profile: Bandung City, Indonesia. Cities 50:100-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.09.005
Tzanis, A. 2010. MATGPR Release 2: A freeware MATLAB® package for the analysis & interpretation of common & single offset GPR data. FastTIMES, April 2010, 15(1):17-43. Software for Analysis of Near-Surface Gephysical Data.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Submission of a manuscript implies: that the work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, or thesis) that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher. 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Scientific Journal by Eko Handayanto is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://ub.ac.id.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://ircmedmind.ub.ac.id/.
This work is licensed under a 