Application of organic matter to enhance phytoremediation of mercury contaminated soils using local plant species: a case study on small-scale gold mining locations in Banyuwangi of East Java


  • N Muddarisna Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang
  • B C Siahaan Former soil science student, Brawijaya University



indigenous plant species, mercury contaminated soil organic matter, phytoremediation


The discharge of small-scale gold mine tailing to agricultural lands at Pesanggaran village of Banyuwangi Regency caused soil degradation as indicated by reduced crop production. This soil degradation is mainly due to the toxicity of mercury contained in the tailing. The purpose of this study was to explore the potential of three local plant species, i.e. Lindernia crustacea, Digitaria radicosa, and Cyperus kyllingia for phytoremediation of agricultural land contaminated gold mine waste containing mercury, and its influence on the growth of maize. Six treatments (three plant species, and two levels of organic matter application) were arranged in a randomized block design with three replicates. Maize was grown on soil after phytoremediation for 8 weeks. The results showed that among the three plant species tested, Cyperus kyllingia was the potential candidate plant species for phytoremediation of soil contaminated with gold mine tailing containing mercury because of its ability to accumulate mercury from 32.06 to 73.90 mg / kg of soil in 60 days. Phytoremediation of mercury contaminated soil using Cyperus kyllingia using increased maize yield by 126% compared to that the biomass yield of maize grown on soil without phytoremediation. Induce phytoremediation needs to be carried out to accelerate the process of remediation of mercury contaminated soils.

Author Biographies

N Muddarisna, Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang

Senior Lecturer

B C Siahaan, Former soil science student, Brawijaya University



Ashraf, M.A., Maah, M.J. and Yusoff, I. 2011. Heavy metals accumulation in plants growing in ex tin mining catchment. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 8 : 401-416.

Banuelos, G.S. and Dhillon, K.S. 2011. Developing a sustainable phytomanagement strategy for excessive selenium in Western United States and India. International Journal of Phytoremediation 13, Suppl 1, 208-228.

Chen, J. and Yang, Z.M. 2012. Mercury toxicity, molecular response and tolerance in higher plants. BioMetals 25 : 847-857.

Evans, L.J. 1989. Chemistry of metal retention by soils. Environmental Science and Technology 23 :1046-1056.

Fasani, E. 2012. Plants that hyperaccumalte Heavy Metals. In. Plants and Heavy Metals. A. Furini (ed). Springer Briefs in Biometals, pp 55-74.

Fayiga A.Q., Ma L.Q. 2006. Using phosphate rock to immobilize metals in soils and increase arsenic uptake in Pteris vittata. Science of the Total Environmen, 359: 17–25

Fitter, A.H. and Hay, R.K.M. 2004. Environmental Physiology of Plants. Academic Press, London, UK, 367 pp.

Fitz, W.J. and Wenzel, W.W. 2002. Arsenic transformation in the soil–rhizosphere–plant system, fundamentals and potential application of phytoremediation. Journal of Biotechnology 99 : 259–78.

Hidayati, N., Juhaeti, T. and Syarif, F. 2009. Mercury and Cyanide Contaminations in Gold Mine Environment and Possible Solution of Cleaning Up by Using Phytoextraction. Hayati Journal of Biosciences 16 : 88-94.

Hinton, J.J. 2002. Earthworms as a Bioindicator of Mercury Pollution in an Artisanal Gold Mining Community, Cachoeira do Piriá, Brazil. Master Thesis. University of British Columbia, Canada.

Hooda, P.S. 2010. Trace Elements in Soils, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Hylander, L.D., Plath, D., Miranda, C.R., Lucke, S., Ohlander, J. and Rivera, A.T.F. 2007. Comparison of different gold recovery methods with regard to pollution kontrol and efficiency. Clean 35 : 52-61.

Lin, C., Zhu, T., Liu, T. and Wang, D. 2010. Influences of major nutrient elements on Pb accumulation of two crops from a Pb-contaminated soil. Journal of Hazardeous Materials 174 : 2002-2008.

Moldovan, O.T., Meleg, I.N., Levei, E. and Terente, M. 2013. A simple method for assessing biotic indicators and predicting biodiversity in the hyporheic zone of a river polluted with metals. Ecological Indicators 24 : 412-420.

Morel, F.M.M., Krapiel, A.M.L. and Amyot, M. 1998. The chemical cycle and bioaccumulation of mercury. Annual Review of Ecological System 29 : 543-566.

Muddarisna, N., Krisnayanti, B.D., Utami, S.R. and Handayanto, E. 2013. The potential of wild plants for phytoremediation of soil contaminated with mercury of gold cyanidation tailings. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology 4 (1): 15-19.

Nagajyoti, P.C., Lee, K.D. and Sreekanth, T.V.M. 2010. Heavy metals, occurrence and toxicity for plants: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters 8 : 199-216.

Pedron, F., Petruzzelli, G., Barbafieri, M., Tassi, E., Ambrosini, P., and Patata, L. 2011. Mercury mobilization in a contaminated industrial soil for phytoremediation. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 42 : 2767-2777.

Rascio, N. and Navari-Izzo, F. 2011. Heavy metal hyperaccumulating plants: How and why do they do it? And what makes them so interesting?. Plant Science 180 : 169-181.

Sarawet, S. and Rai, J.P.N. 2009. Phytoextraction potential of six plant species grown in multimetal contaminated soil. Chemistry and Ecology 25 : 1- 11

Selin, N.E. 2009. Global Biogeochemical Cycling of Mercury: A Review. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 34 : 43-63.

Sun, Y.B., Zhou, Q.X., An J., Liu W.T. and Liu R. 2009. Chelator enhanced phytoextraction of heavy metals from contaminated soil irrigated by industrial wastewater with the hyperaccumulator plant (Sedum alfredii Hance). Geoderma 150 : 106–112.

Veiga, M.M., Maxson, P.A. and Hylander, L.D. 2006. Origin and consumption of mercury in small-scale gold mining. Journal of Cleaner Production 14: 436-447.

Wallschläger, D., Desai, V.M.M. and Wilken, R. 1996. The role of humic substances in the aqueous mobilization of mercury from contaminated floodplain soils. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 90 : 507–520.

Wallschlager, D., Desai, V.M.M., Spengler, M. and Wilken, R. 1998a Mercury speciation in floodplain soils and sediments along a contaminated river transect. Journal of Environmental Quality 27 : 1034–1044.

Wallschläger, D., Desai, V.M.M., Spengler, M., Windmöller, C.C. and Wilken, R. 1998b. How humic substances dominate mercury geochemistry in contaminated floodplain soils and sediments. Journal of Environmental Quality 27 : 1044–1057.

Wuana, R.A. and Okieimen, F.E. 2011. Heavy metals in contaminated soils: a review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation. ISRN Ecology 11, 1-19.

Yoon, J., Cao, X. and Zhou, O. 2006. Accumulation of Pb, Cu, and Zn in native plants growing on a contaminated Florida site. Science of the Total Environment 368 : 456–464

Zacchini, M., Pietrini, F., Mugnozza, G. and Lori, V. 2008. Metal tolerance, accumulation and translocation in poplar and willow clones treated with cadmium in hydroponics. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 197: 23- 34

Zhang W.H., Cai Y., Tu C., Ma Q.L. 2002. Arsenic speciation and distribution in an arsenic hyperaccumulating plant. Science of the Total Environment 300: 167–177.








How to Cite

Muddarisna, N., & Siahaan, B. C. (2014). Application of organic matter to enhance phytoremediation of mercury contaminated soils using local plant species: a case study on small-scale gold mining locations in Banyuwangi of East Java. Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management, 2(1), 251–258.



Research Article