Permeable reactive barriers for groundwater contaminant removal: Mechanisms, materials, and challenges

Authors

  • Mohammed Mansour Meky Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Beni Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt
  • Nagy Ali Hassan Irrigation and Hydraulics Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9589-1333
  • Hoda Soussa Irrigation and Hydraulics Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2866-5357
  • Mohamed Elsayed Gabr Civil Engineering Department, Higher Institute for Engineering and Technology, New Damietta, Ministry of Higher Education, Cairo, Egypt https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2448-601X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15243/jdmlm.2025.124.8005

Keywords:

contaminants , funnel and gate , groundwater, non-pumping wells , permeable reactive barriers , remediation

Abstract

Groundwater pollution from industrial, agricultural, and municipal sources presents a critical environmental challenge, necessitating adopting sustainable remediation strategies. As a result of this crucial issue, groundwater remediation strategies have gained traction, with a particular focus on sustainable techniques. Among these, Permeable Reactive Barriers (PRBs) are considered a promising, low-cost, and sustainable groundwater remediation approach. This review examines the main concept, configurations, design procedures, and applications of PRBs, emphasizing their role in intercepting and degrading pollutants through various removal mechanisms such as adsorption, ion exchange, and microbial activity based on the used reactive materials. The selection of reactive materials is explored concerning their effectiveness in contaminant removal, while different PRB configurations are analyzed for their environmental benefits, hydraulic performance, and cost efficiency. This study also analyzes the challenges associated with PRBs, including site heterogeneity, material selection, and maintenance requirements. By synthesizing existing research and real-world applications, this study provides a detailed evaluation of PRBs as a promising technology for sustainable groundwater remediation.

References

Alazaiza, M.Y.D., Albahnasawi, A., Ali, G.A.M., Bashir, M.J.K., Copty, N.K., Amr, S.S.A., Abushammala, M.F.M. and Al Maskari, T. 2021. Recent advances of nanoremediation technologies for soil and groundwater remediation: A review. Water 13(16):2186. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13162186

Bilardi, S., Salvatore, P. and Moraci, N. 2023. A review of the hydraulic performance of permeable reactive barriers based on granular zero valent iron. Water 15(1):200. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010200

Blachnio, M., Derylo-Marczewska, A., Charmas, B., Zienkiewicz-Strzalka, M., Bogatyrov, V. and Galaburda, M. 2020. Activated carbon from agricultural wastes for adsorption of organic pollutants. Molecules 25(21):5105. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25215105

Bruton, T.A., Pycke, B.F.G. and Halden, R.U. 2015. Effect of nanoscale zero-valent iron treatment on biological reductive dechlorination: A review of current understanding and research needs. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 45(11):1148-1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2014.924185

Budania, R. and Dangayach, S. 2023. A comprehensive review on permeable reactive barrier for the remediation of groundwater contamination. Journal of Environmental Management 332(January):117343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117343

Carrard, N., Foster, T. and Willetts, J. 2019. Groundwater as a source of drinking water in Southeast Asia and the Pacific?: A multi-country review of current reliance and resource concerns. Water 11(8):1605. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081605

Chen, L., Lei, Z., Luo, X., Wang, D., Li, L. and Li, A. 2019. Biological degradation and transformation characteristics of total petroleum hydrocarbons by oil degradation bacteria adsorbed on modified straw. ACS Omega 4(6):10921-10928. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b00906

Courcelles, B. 2014. Guidelines for preliminary design of funnel and gate reactive barriers. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Environmental Pollution and Remediation, Prague, Czech Republic, August 11-13, 2014 Paper No. 81

Ekolu, S.O., Diop, S., Azene, F., Ekolu, S.O., Diop, S. and Azene, F. 2016. Properties of pervious concrete for hydrological applications. Concrete Beton. Journal of the Concrete Society of Southern Africa 144:18-25.

EPA. 2018. Remedial Technology Fact Sheet – Activated Carbon- Based Technology for In Situ Remediation Introduction (Issue April). EPA 542-F-18-001.

Gadipelli, S. and Guo, Z.X. 2015. Graphene-based materials: Synthesis and gas sorption, storage, and separation. Progress in Materials Science 69:1-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.10.004

Gavaskar, A.R. 1999. Design and construction techniques for permeable reactive barriers. Journal of Hazardous Materials 68(1-2):41-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00031-X

Georgi, A., Schierz, A., Mackenzie, K. and Kopinke, F. 2015. Colloidal activated carbon for in-situ groundwater remediation — Transport characteristics and adsorption of organic compounds in water-saturated sediment columns. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 179:76-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2015.05.002

Goo, J.Y., Kim, J.H. and Lee, Y.J. and Lee, S. 2021. Configuration of non-pumping reactive wells considering minimum well spacing. Applied Sciences 11(23):11408. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311408

Harter, T. 2003. Groundwater Quality and Groundwater Pollution. Uneversity of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources. ISBN-13: 978-1-60107-259-7. https://doi.org/10.3733/ucanr.8084

He, Q., Si, S., Yang, J. and Tu, X. 2019. Application of permeable reactive barrier in groundwater remediation. E3S Web of Conferences 136:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201913606021

Hosseini, S.M., Tosco, T., Ataie-ashtiani, B. and Simmons, C.T. 2018. Non-pumping reactive wells filled with mixing nano and micro zero-valent iron for nitrate removal from groundwater?: Vertical, horizontal, and slanted wells. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 210:40-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2018.02.006

Hsieh, C.T. and Teng, H. 2000. Influence of mesopore volume and adsorbate size on adsorption capacities of activated carbons in aqueous solutions. Carbon 38(6):863-869. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00180-3

Ibrahim, O.A.G.A.M. 2011. Evaluation of Synthetic Zeolite As an Engineering Passive Permeable Reactive Barrier. Graduate Theses and Dissertations (Issue September). Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.

Jayasundara, R.B.C.D., Udayagee, K.P.P., Karunarathna, A.K., Manage, P.M., Nugara, R.N. and Abhayapala, K.M.R.D. 2023. Permeable reactive barriers as an in-situ groundwater remediation technique for open solid waste dumpsites: A review and prospect. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 234(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-022-06056-z

Kojo, S., Boansi, O., Abah, S., Ebo, E., Amuah, Y. and Daanoba, E. 2023. Sources and factors in influencing groundwater quality and associated health implications?: A review. Emerging Contaminants 9(2):100207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emcon.2023.100207

Kubier, A., Wilkin, R.T. and Pichler, T. 2019. Cadmium in soils and groundwater?: A review. Applied Geochemistry 108(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2019.104388

Li, S., Huang, G., Kong, X., Yang, Y., Liu, F., Hou, G. and Chen, H. 2014. Ammonium removal from groundwater using a zeolite permeable reactive barrier: A pilot-scale demonstration. Water Science and Technology 70(9):1540-1547. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2014.411

Liu, Z., Sun, Y., Xu, X., Qu, J. and Qu, B. 2020. Adsorption of Hg(II) in an aqueous solution by activated carbon prepared from rice husk using KOH activation. ACS Omega 5(45):29231-29242. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c03992

Medvidovic, N.V., Nuic, I., Ugrina, M. and Trgo, M. 2018. Evaluation of natural zeolite as a material for permeable reactive barrier for remediation of zinc-contaminated groundwater based on column study. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 229(11):21000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-018-4019-3

Mkilima, T., Devrishov, D., Assel, K., Ubaidulayeva, N., Tleukulov, A., Khassenova, A., Yussupova, N. and Birimzhanova, D. 2022. Natural zeolite for the purification of saline groundwater and irrigation potential analysis. Molecules 27(22):1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27227729

Nedvidek, D.C. 2014. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Regulatory Stormwater Monitoring Protocols on Groundwater Quality in Urbanized Karst Regions. Master Thesis and Specialist Projects. Paper 1407. Western Kentucky University.

Park, J.B., Lee, S.H., Lee, J.W., and Lee, C.Y. 2002. Lab scale experiments for permeable reactive barriers against contaminated groundwater with ammonium and heavy metals using clinoptilolite (01-29B). Journal of Hazardous Materials 95(1-2):65-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00007-9

Rocha, L.C.C. and Zuquette, L.V. 2020. Evaluation of zeolite as a potential reactive medium in a permeable reactive barrier (PRB): Batch and column studies. Geosciences 10(2):59. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10020059

Sakr, M., El Agamawi, H., Klammler, H. and Mohamed, M.M. 2023. A review on the use of permeable reactive barriers as an effective technique for groundwater remediation. Groundwater for Sustainable Development 21(September 2022):100914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2023.100914

Shabalala, A.N., Ekolu, S.O., Diop, S. and Solomon, F. 2016. Pervious concrete reactive barrier for removal of heavy metals from acid mine drainage? column study. Journal of Hazardous Materials 323 Part B:641-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.10.027

Sharma, G., Sharma, S., Kumar, A., Lai, C.W., Naushad, M., Shehnaz, Iqbal, J. and Stadler, F.J. 2022. Activated carbon as superadsorbent and sustainable material for diverse applications. Adsorption Science and Technology 2022:1-21. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4184809

Singh, R., Chakma, S. and Birke, V. 2020. Groundwater for Sustainable Development: Numerical modelling and performance evaluation of multi-permeable reactive barrier system for aquifer remediation susceptible to chloride contamination. Groundwater for Sustainable Development 10(December 2019):100317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100317

Taylor, J.H. and Soltani, S.M. 2023. Carbonaceous adsorbents in the removal of aquaculture pollutants: A technical review of methods and mechanisms. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 266:115552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115552

Thakur, A.K., Vithanage, M., Das, D.B. and Kumar, M. 2020. A review on design, material selection, mechanism, and modelling of permeable reactive barrier for community-scale groundwater treatment. Environmental Technology and Innovation 19:100917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.100917

The Interstate Technology and Regulatory Counciland. 2011. Technical / Regulatory Guidance Permeable Reactive Barrier?: Technology Update (Issue June). Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council 50 F Street, NW, Suite 350, Washington, DC 20001.

Tratnyek, P.G., Johnson, R.L., Lowry, G.V. and Brown, R.A. 2014. IN SITU Chemical Reduction for Source Remediation. In: Chlorinated Solvent Source Zone Remediation, 307-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6922-3_10

Truex, M., Johnson, C., Macbeth, T., Becker, D., Lynch, K., Giaudrone, D., Frantz, A. and Lee, H. 2017. Performance assessment of pump-and-treat systems. Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation 3:28-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwmr.12218

Ugrina, M. and Juri, A. 2023. Current trends and future perspectives in the remediation of polluted water, soil and air — A review. Processes 11(12):3270. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11123270

Urenda, F.R. 2009. Groundwater Contamination, Protection and Remediation. In: Silveira, L. and Usunoff, E.J. (eds.), Groundwater (p. 38). Volume III, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Publications, 20 February 2009 - 414 pages.

Vainberg, S., Condee, C.W. and Ste, R.J. 2009. Large-scale production of bacterial consortia for remediation of chlorinated solvent-contaminated groundwater. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 36(9):1189-1197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-009-0600-5

Wang, P., Li, J., An, P., Yang, B., Hou, D. and Pu, S. 2024. Understanding the dilemmas and breakdown of the reactive migration of in situ groundwater injection reagents from an environmental geology perspective. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 54(9):747-770. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2023.2277649

Yuan, H., Qu, Z., Zhang, C., Li, C., Qi, R. and Zhu, L. 2023. Zero-valent iron-reactive recirculation wells for remediation of benzene and toluene contaminated groundwater in homogeneous and nonhomogeneous aquifers. Polish Journal in Environmental Studies 32(4):3385-3394. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/163158

Zaki, S.R., Redwan, M., Masoud, A.M. and Moneim, A.A.A. 2012. Chemical characteristics and assessment of groundwater quality in Halayieb area, southeastern part of the Eastern Desert, Egypt. Geosciences Journal 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-018-0020-5

Zendelska, A., Golomeova, M., Blazev, K., Boev, B., Krstev, B., Golomeov, B. and Krstev, A. 2015. Kinetic studies of manganese removal from aqueous solution by adsorption on natural zeolite. Macedonian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering 34(1):213-220. https://doi.org/10.20450/mjcce.2015.552

Downloads

Submitted

25-03-2025

Accepted

10-05-2025

Published

01-07-2025

How to Cite

Meky, M. M., Hassan, N. A., Soussa, H., & Gabr, M. E. (2025). Permeable reactive barriers for groundwater contaminant removal: Mechanisms, materials, and challenges. Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management, 12(4), 8005–8014. https://doi.org/10.15243/jdmlm.2025.124.8005

Issue

Section

Review