Indexed By
Article Tools
Email this article (Login required)
Email the author (Login required)
About The Authors

Eri Yusnita Arvianti
Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Tribhuwana Tunggadewi University
Indonesia

Ratna Wati
Master Program in Agricultural Economics, Postgraduate School, Tribhuwana Tunggadewi University
Indonesia

Cakti Indra Gunawan
Master Program in Agricultural Economics, Postgraduate School, Tribhuwana Tunggadewi University
Indonesia

Karunia Setyowati
Animal Husbandry Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Tribhuwana Tunggadewi University
Indonesia

User
Author Guidelines

SJR Rank

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Sinta Rank

Sinta Rank

Visitor Statistic

Optimization of critical land empowerment through coffee plant extensification as an effort to improve the economic level of coffee farmers in Indonesia

Eri Yusnita Arvianti, Ratna Wati, Cakti Indra Gunawan, Karunia Setyowati
  J. Degrade. Min. Land Manage. , pp. 4457-4465  
Viewed : 128 times

Abstract


Critical land in Indonesia is the result of weather disturbances, natural disasters, farming behavior without considering the preservation of nature, and the unwise use of chemical fertilizers. Critical land tends to be acidic and has a soil structure that does not support cultivation. Coffee plants are flexible plants, and their root systems and ecology can improve soil structure. The need for coffee at home and abroad tends to increase along with the development of coffee consumption as a lifestyle for Generation Z (Gen-Z). The economic value of coffee, which tends to increase, opens the insight of farmers to continue to develop this coffee plantation area. In the development of planting areas, knowledge of critical land optimization is needed, which is a principal factor as the basis for implementing critical land extensification. For this reason, the purpose of this study was to determine the level of knowledge of farmers on optimizing critical land into strategic land and efforts to develop coffee agribusiness in critical land. This study used a quantitative descriptive method and used the SmartPLS3 analysis tool. The results showed that internal factors, external factors, and motivation of farmers affect the level of knowledge about optimization of critical land, critical land management must meet ecological conservation and improve the community's economy in a structured manner, the extensification of critical land using coffee plants is one of the strategic steps for critical land optimization, as well as the development of coffee agribusiness, both seeds and waste as an effort to increase farmers' income.


Keywords


coffee plants; critical land; extensification; optimization

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bannor, R.K., Amfo, B., Oppong-Kyeremeh, H., Hope, L., Chaa Kyire, S.K. and Djimatey, R. 2022. Land tenure system and harvesting time’s influence on the marketing behaviour of cashew farmers in the Bono Region of Ghana. Heliyon 8(11):e11392, doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11392.

Behailu, B.M., Pietilä, P.E. and Katko, T.S. 2016. Indigenous practices of water management for sustainable services: case of Borana and Konso, Ethiopia. SAGE Open 6(4), doi:10.1177/2158244016682292.

BPS. 2019. Indonesian Environmental Statistics 2019. Central Bureau of Statistics, 1-224 (in Indonesian).

BPS. 2021. Indonesian Coffee Statistics 2021. Central Bureau of Statistics, 1-101(in Indonesian).

BPS. 2022. Bulletin of Export Foreign Trade Statistics by Commodity and Country Groups, October 2022, 1-274 (in Indonesian).

Burton, R.J. 2014. The influence of farmer demographic characteristics on environmental behaviour: a review. Journal of Environmental Management 135:19-26.

Debie, E. 2021. Smallholder farmers’ decisions to the combined use of soil conservation practices in Tiwa watershed, Northwest highlands of Ethiopia. Heliyon 7: e05958, doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05958.

Effendy, Hanani, N., Setiawan, B. and Muhaimin, A.W. 2013. Effect characteristics of farmers on the level of technology adoption Side-Grafting in cocoa farming at Sigi Regency-Indonesia. Journal of Agricultural Science (Toronto) 5(12):72-77.

Etriya, E., Scholten, V.E., Wubben, E.F. and Omta, S.O. 2019. The impact of networks on the innovative and financial performance of more entrepreneurial versus less entrepreneurial farmers in West Java, Indonesia. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 89:100308.

Ferreira, T., Shuler, J., Guimarães, R. and Farah, A. (2019). Chapter 1: Introduction to coffee plant and genetics. In: Coffee Production, Quality and Chemistry. pp. 1-25, doi:10.1039/9781782622437-00001.

García, S.O., Santillan, V.S, Vivier, V.B., Anglés-Hernández, M., Pérez, M.E. and Prado, B. 2022. Soil governance and sustainable agriculture in Mexico. Soil Security 7:100059, doi:10.1016/j.soisec.2022.100059.

Hall, R., Scoones, I. and Tsikata, D. 2017. Plantations, outgrowers and commercial farming in Africa: agricultural commercialisation and implications for agrarian change. Journal of Peasant Studies 44(3):515-537, doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1263187.

Hayakawa, K. and Mukunoki, H. 2021. The impact of COVID-19 on international trade: evidence from the first shock. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 60:101135, doi:10.1016/j.jjie.2021.101135.

Huang, M.H. and Rust, R.T. 2018. Artificial Intelligence in Service. Journal of Service Research 21(2):155-172, doi:10.1177/1094670517752459.

Huang, X., Ye, Y., Zhao, X., Guo, X. and Ding, H. 2022. Identification and stability analysis of critical ecological land: case study of a hilly county in southern China. Ecological Indicator 141(1101):109091, doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109091.

Johnson, R.D. and Gueutal, H.G. 2017. SHRM Foundation’s Effective Practice Guidelines Series The Use of EHR and HRIS in Organizations Transforming HR Through Technology. dari (www.shrm.org/foundation).

Lee, H., Lee, J. and Shim, K. 2016. Entrepreneurial characteristics: a systematic literature review. In 20th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2016. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems.

Lin, B.Xi, and Zhang, Y.Y. 2020. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on agricultural exports. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 19(12):2937-2945, doi:10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63430-X.

Mahyuda, M., Amanah, S. and Tjitropranoto, P. 2018. The adoption rate of good agricultural practices of Gayo arabica coffee cultivation by farmers in Central Aceh Regency. Jurnal Penyuluhan 14(2):308-323 (in Indonesian).

Melvani, K., Myers, L. B., Stacey, N., Bristow, M., Crase, B. and Moles, J. 2022. Farmers’ values for land, trees and biodiversity underlie agricultural sustainability. Land Use Policy 117:105688, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105688.

Minello, I.F., Scherer, L.A. and da Costa Alves, L. 2014. Entrepreneurial competencies and business failure. International Journal of Entrepreneurship 18:1-16.

Nandini, R. 2018. Benefits analysis of agroforestry farming patterned candlenuts, cacao, coffee and banana in Sesaot Community Forest, West Lombok. Faloak 1(2):1-12.

Prokopy, L.S., Floress, K., Arbuckle, J.G., Church, S.P., Eanes, F.R., Gao, Y., Gramig, B.M. and Ranjan, P. 2019. Adoption of agricultural conservation practices in the United States: Evidence from 35 years of quantitative literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 74(5):520-34, doi:10.2489/jswc.74.5.520.

Rasak, O.B. and Amusat, A.S. 2012. Perceived efficacy of radio agricultural commodities trend programme among farmers in Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Media and Communication Studies 4(3):46-51, doi:10.5897/JMCS11.097.

Saha, S., Monroe, A. and Day, M.R. 2016. Growth, yield, plant quality and nutrition of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) under soilless agricultural systems. Annals of Agricultural Sciences 61(2):181-186, doi:10.1016/j.aoas.2016.1 0.001.

Tufaila, M., Aliyaman, Ginting, S. and Alam, S. 2014. Evaluation of land fitness for crop of coffee, cocoa, and cashew in District North Moramo, South Konawe. Agroteknos 4(3):167-173 (in Indonesian).

van Wyk, A S. and Prinsloo, G. 2019. A review of the ethnobotanical uses, pharmacology, toxicology, management, and cultivation of selected South African protected multi-purpose tree species. South African Journal of Botany 124:258-269, doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2019.0 5.012.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Indexed By