The comparison analysis of land cover change based on vegetation index and multispectral classification (Case study Leihitu Peninsula Ambon City District)
The study utilized Landsat-7 ETM+ 2001and Landsat TM5 2009 based on Normalized Differences Vegetation Index (NDVI) and 457 colour composite at the study area located in Leihitu Peninsula, Ambon City District, Ambon Island, Moluccas Province. The classified satellite data under NDVI and 457 colour composite of 2001 and 2009 of 2001 and 2009 were used to determine land cover change that have occurred in the study areas. This study attempts to use a comparative change detection analysis in land cover that has occurred in the study area with NDVI and 457 colour composite over 9 year period (2001 to 2009). The results of the present study disclose that total area increased their land cover were bare land and impermeable surface, herbaceous and shrubs, low density vegetation, and medium density vegetation, while high density vegetation is decreasing in both NDVI and 457 colour composite analysis. Overall accuracy was estimated to be around 94.3 % for NDVI and for 457 Colour composites was 84.7%. The study area has experienced a change in its land cover between 2001 and 2009 in both NDVI and 457 false colour composite analyses. The whole land cover types have experienced increased in both methods, except high density vegetation. The transformations of spectral vegetation (NDVI) product more closely with actual land cover compared with 457 colour composite product.
Aplin, P., Atkinson, P.M. and Curran, P.J. 1999. Per-field classification of land use using the forthcoming very fine spatial resolution satellite sensors: problems and potential solutions. In Atkinson, P.M., and Tate, N.J., (eds) Advances in remote Sensing and GIS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York, NY. 219-239.
FAO. 2000. Land Cover Classification System (LCCS). Natural Resources Management and Environment Department. Rome, Italy.
Foody, G. M. 1996. Approaches for the production and evaluation of fuzzy land cover classification from remotely-sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 17: 1317–1340.
Hardjowigeno, S. and Widiatmaka. 2007. Evaluasi Kesesuaian Lahan dan Perencanaan Tataguna Lahan. Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta.
Ioannis, M. and Meliadis, M. 2011. Multi-temporal Landsat image classification and change analysis of land cover/use in the Prefecture of Thessaloiniki, Greece. Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 1 (1): 15-26.
Jensen, J.1986. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A remote sensing perspective. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs New Jersey, 235 pages
Kachhwala, T.S. 1985. Temporal monitoring of forest land for change detection and forest cover mapping through satellite remote sensing. In: Proceedings of the 6th Asian Conf. on Remote Sensing, Hyderabad. pp. 77-83.
Kavitha, K., Prakasam, C. and Shanthakumari, A. 2012. Land Use Land Cover Change Detection In Madurai District, Tamil Nadu, India: Using Satellite Remote Sensing. International Journal of Physical and Social Sciences 2: 104-117.
Kwarteng, A. Y. 1999. Remote sensing assessment of oil lakes and oil-polluted surfaces at the Greater Burgan oil field, Kuwait. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 1: 36-47.
Lillesand, T. M., Kiefer, R. W. and Chipman, J. W. 2004. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. 5th edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Mani, N., and Krishnan, R. 2013. Assessment of Changes In Land Use/ Land Cover In Tamil Nadu State In India Using GIS. African Journal of Science and Research 2: 01-06.
Morisette, J. T. 1997. Using Generalized Linear Models to Enhance Satellite based Land Cover Change Detection. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 255.
Pal, M. and Mather, P.M. 2003. An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification. Remote Sensing of Environment 86 (4): 554–565.
Pandian. M., Rajagopal, N., Sakthivel, G. and Amrutha, D. 2014. Land use and land cover change detection using remote sensing and GIS in parts of Coimbatore and Tiruppur Districts, Tamil Nadu, India. International Journal of Remote Sensing & Geoscience 3 (1) 2319-3484
Perera, K., Apan, A., McDougall, K. and Samarakoon, L. 2011. Applying the Global Standard FAO LCCS to Map Land Cover of Rural Queensland. Asian Journal of Geoinformatics 11 (3), ISSN 1513-6728
Prakash, A. and Gupta, R. 1998. Land Use Mapping and Change Detection in a Coal Mining Area, a Case Study in the Jh.ria coalfield, IndiaM. International Journal of Remote Sensing 19 (3) : 391-410.
Sabins, F.F. 1996. Remote Sensing Principles and Interpretation. 3rd Ed. W. H. Freeman. New York
Singh, A. 1989. Digital change detection technique using remotely-sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 10 (6) : 989-1003.
Star, J.L., Estes, J.E. and McGwire K.C. 1997. Integration of geographic information systems and Remote Sensing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Stathakis, D., and Kanellopoulos, I. 2008. Global elevation ancillary data for land use classification using granular neural networks. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 74: 55-63.
Stuckens, J., Coppin, P. R. and Bauer, M. E. 2000. Integrating contextual information with per-pixel classification for improved land cover classification. Remote Sensing of Environment 71: 282-296.
Vikhe, S.D. and Patil, K.A. 2014. State of the art of land use planning using remote sensing and GIS. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering 11 (5): 41-47.
Yang, X. and Lo, C. 2002. Using a time series of satellite imagery to detect land use and land cover changes in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area. International Journal of Remote Sensing 3: 1775-1798.
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2015 Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management
License URL: http://jdmlm.ub.ac.id/index.php/jdmlm/about/submissions#copyrightNotice