Article Tools
Email this article (Login required)
Email the author (Login required)
About The Authors

Edyson Indawan
http://unitri.ac.id
Tribhuwana Tunggadewi University
Indonesia

PS Agroteknologi, FP-UNITRI

Sri Umi Lestari
Tribhuwana Tunggadewi University
Indonesia

Senior Lecturer

Nurita Thiasari
Tribhuwana Tunggadewi University
Indonesia

User
Information for Author
Visitor Statistic

Sweet potato response to biochar application on sub-optimal dry land

Edyson Indawan, Sri Umi Lestari, Nurita Thiasari
  J. Degrade. Min. Land Manage. , pp. 1133-1139  
Viewed : 328 times

Abstract


This trial was aimed to evaluate the performance of sweet potato cultivars on biochar application. The treatments were carried out using a Split-plot Design with three replications. The cultivars were placed on main plots and biochar doses were on sub-plots. The thirteen cultivars consisted of seven varieties and six accessions from Tribhuwana Tunggadewi University and Brawijaya University collections. The applied biochar doses were B0 (0 t/ha) and B1 (5 t/ha). The experimental unit measuring of 5 m x 0.6 m consisted of single row and planted with a spacing of 25 cm in row or 20 cuttings/row. The storage root weight, % dry matter, storage root dry weight, dry weight of biomass, harvest index and yield estimation were determined. The results showed that the sweet potato cultivars gave a significant response to the biochar application on fresh storage root weight, storage root dry weight, biomass dry weight, harvest index and storage root yields, but no interaction between cultivars and biochar doses. Storage root yield ranged from 8 to 21 t/ha without biochar and from 10 to 23 t/ha with 5 t biochar /ha, except for Beta 1 and Boko. The use of 5 t biochar /ha increased storage root yields that ranged from 8 to 45%.


Keywords


biochar from tobacco industry waste; sweet potato; storage root fresh weight

Full Text:

PDF

References


Biederman, L.A. and Harpole, W.S. 2013. Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta‐analysis. GCB Bioenergy 5(2): 202-214.

Ding, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, S., Li, Z., Tan, X., Huang, X., Zeng, G., Zhou, L. and Zheng, B. 2016. Biochar to improve soil fertility. A Review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 36(2): 36 (1-18).

Hunt, J., DuPonte, M., Sato, D. and Kawabata, A. 2010. The basics of biochar: A natural soil amendment. Soil and Crop Management 30(7): 1-6.

ILETRI. 2010. Production technology of sweet potato. Balitkabi.litbang.pertanian.go.id (Accessed on the 10th of September 2017).

Kim, H.S., Kim, K.R., Yang, J.E., Ok, Y.S., Owens, G., Nehls, T., Wessolek, G. and Kim, K.H. 2016. Effect of biochar on reclaimed tidal land, soil properties and maize (Zea mays L.) response. Chemosphere 142: 153-159.

Kozai, T., Kubota, C. and Kitaya, Y. 1996. Sweet potato technology for solving the global issues on food, energy, natural resources and environment in the 21st century. (Japanese text.). Environmental Control in Biology 34:105–114.

Motsa, N.M., Modi, A.T. and Mabhaudhi, T. 2015. Sweet potato response to low-input agriculture and varying environments of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: implications for food security strategies. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B—Soil and Plant Science 65(4): 329-340.

Saleh, N. and Hartojo, K. 2003. Present status and future research in sweetpotato in Indonesia. In K.O. Fuglie (Ed.). Progress in Potato and Sweetpotato Research in Indonesia. CIP-ESEAP and IAARD. pp. 137-153.

Sheth, S.G., Desai, K.D, Patil, S.J., Navya, K. and Chaudhari, V.L. 2017. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield and quality of sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam]. International Journal of Chemical Studies 5(4): 346-349.

Sitorus, S.R., Susanto, B. and Haridjaja, O. 2011. Criteria and classification of land degradation on dry land (Case study: Dry land in Bogor regency) (in Indonesian). Repository.ipb.ac.id.

Talkah, A. 2010. Waste prospect of tobacco industry cigarette as organic fertilizer with national quality standard (Toward Eco-Friendly Organic Agriculture (in Indonesian). Uniska Press Kediri Jl. Sersan Suharmadji 38 Kediri.

Zhang, Y.C., Wang, J.D., Shi, Y.X. and Ma, D.F. 2017. Nutrient Management for high efficiency sweet potato production. In: Phytonutritional Improvement of Crops p 471-497, DOI: 10.1002/9781119079972.ch14.

Ziska, L.H., Runion, G.B., Tomecek, M., Prior, S.A., Torbet, H.A. and Sicher, R. 2009. An evaluation of cassava, sweet potato and field corn as potential carbohydrate sources for bioethanol production in Alabama and Maryland. Biomass and Bioenergy 33 (11): 1503-1508.

Zuraida, N. and Supriati, Y. 2001. Sweet potato farming as alternative food and diversification of carbohydrate sources. Buletin Agrobio 4(1): 13-23 (in Indonesian).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Indexed By