Information for Author
Visitor Statistic

Journal Content



Online Submissions

Already have a Username/Password for Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management?
Go to Login

Need a Username/Password?
Go to Registration

Registration and login are required to submit items online and to check the status of current submissions.


Author Guidelines

Types of contributions

Two types of manuscripts may be submitted:

Research articles: These should describe new and carefully confirmed findings, and experimental procedures should be given in sufficient detail for others to verify the work. The length of a full paper should be the minimum required to describe and interpret the work clearly.

Reviews: Submissions of reviews and perspectives covering topics of current interest are welcome and encouraged. Reviews are also peer-reviewed




A template  to guide authors in the preparation of the manuscript can be downloaded here (Template). Length a complete manuscript should be no less than 4 pages and no more than 12 pages (10 pt, single-spaced, including figures, tables, and references).

Review Process

All manuscripts are reviewed by an editor and members of the editorial team or qualified international reviewers. Decisions will be made as rapidly as possible, and the journal strives to return reviewers’ comments to authors within four weeks. The editorial board will re-review manuscripts that are accepted pending revision.

Plagiarism Policy

Whether intentional or not, plagiarism is a serious violation. Plagiarism is the copying of ideas, text, data and other creative work (e.g. tables, figures and graphs) and presenting it as original research without proper citation. The Journal defines plagiarism as a case in which a paper reproduces another work with at least 25% similarity and without citation. If evidence of plagiarism is found before/after acceptance or after publication of the paper, the author will be offered a chance for rebuttal. If the arguments are not found to be satisfactory, the manuscript will be retracted and the author sanctioned from publishing papers for a period to be determined by the responsible Editor(s).



The Title should be a brief phrase describing the contents of the paper. This should include the full author names (with no titles or qualifications), institutional addresses (Department, Institute, City, Post/Zip code, Country), and email addresses for all authors. Authors and affiliations must be linked using superscript numerals. The corresponding author should also be indicated. The title should be no more than 15 words in length.

Abstract and Keywords

The abstract should be informative and completely self-explanatory, briefly present the topic, state the scope of the experiments, indicate significant data, and point out major findings and conclusions. The Abstract should be 150 to 250 words in length.. Complete sentences, active verbs, and the third person should be used, and the abstract should be written in the past tense. Standard nomenclature should be used and abbreviations should be avoided. While the abstract is conceptually divided into three sections (Background, Methodology/Principal Findings, and Conclusions/Significance), do not apply these distinct headings to the abstract within the article file. No literature should be cited. Following the abstract, about five key words that will provide indexing references should be listed.


The Introduction should provide a clear statement of the problem, the relevant literature on the subject, and the proposed approach or solution. It should be understandable to colleagues from a broad range of scientific disciplines.

Materials and Methods

Experimental procedures should be given in sufficient detail to allow these to be replicated by other researchers. The source of the various reagents and materials used in the study should be given, where possible. Capitalize trade names and include the manufacturer's name and address. Subheadings should be used. Methods in general use need not be described in detail.


The results section should provide details of all of the experiments that are required to support the conclusions of the paper. There is no specific word limit for this section, but details of experiments that are peripheral to the main thrust of the article and that detract from the focus of the article should not be included. The results should be written in the past tense when describing findings in the authors' experiments. Previously published findings should be written in the present tense. The section may be divided into subsections, each with a concise subheading. Results should be explained, but largely without referring to the literature. Discussion, speculation and detailed interpretation of data should not be included in the Results but should be put into the Discussion section..


This section should present comprehensive analysis of the results in the light of any previous research. The Results and Discussion sections can include subheadings, and when appropriate, both sections can be combined.


Conclusion section should bring out the significance of the research paper, show how it has brought closure to the research problem, and point out remaining gaps in knowledge by suggesting issues for further research.



The authors should first acknowledge the source of funding for the research presented in their article followed by any personal credits. The Acknowledgments should be brief.


All publications cited in the text should be presented in a list of references following the text of the manuscript.  In the text, the citations should be referred to by author's name and year of publication enclosed in parentheses, e.g. (Selin, 2009; Chen and Yang, 2012; Moldovan et al., 2013). If reference is made in the text to a publication written by more than two authors the name of the first author should be used followed by “et al.” In the list of references, however, list names of first author and all co-authors should be mentioned.  References cited together in the text should be arranged chronologically. The list of references should be arranged alphabetically on author's names, and chronologically per author.

Examples follow:

Journal Papers:

Wei, S., Zhou, Q. and Mathews, S. 2008. A newly found cadmium accumulator-Taraxacum mongolicum. Journal of Hazardous Materials 159:544–547.

Ebbs, S.D. and Kochian, L.V. 1997. Toxicity of zinc  and copper to Brassica species: implications for phytoremediation. Journal of Environmental Quality 5: 1424–1430.


Anderson, J.M. and Ingram, J.S. I. 1992. Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Methods, 2nd edition. CAB International. Wallingford, Oxon, UK. 191p.

Chapters in Books:

Baker, A. J. M., McGrath, S.P., Reeves, R.D. and Smith, J.A.C. 2000. Metal hyper-accumulator plants: a review of the ecology and physiology of a biological resource for phytoremediation of metal-polluted soils. In: Terry, N. and Banuelos, G. (eds), Phytoremediation of Contaminated Soil and Water. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL., pp 85–107.

Proceedings Papers:

Doronila, A.I., Unson, J.R.S., Penaranda, M.C.R., Gotera, K.M.C. and Claveria, R.J.R. 2010. The discovery of a nickel hyperaccumulator plant, Breynia sp. in the ultramafic terrains of Zambales, Philippines. Proceedings of the 1st National Conference on Bioremediation. 26-27 October 2010. Traders Hotel, Pasay City, Philippines. p 18-25.



Tables should be kept to a minimum and be designed to be as simple as possible. The table title should be concise, no more than two sentences. The rest of the table legend and any footnotes should be placed below the table. Footnotes can be used to explain abbreviations. Tables must be cell-based, such as would be produced in a spreadsheet program or in Microsoft Word. Do not provide tables as graphic objects. Tables must be no larger than one printed page. Do not include colour, shading, lines, rules, text boxes, tabs, returns, or pictures within the table. The details of the methods used in the experiments should preferably be described in the legend instead of in the text. The same data should not be presented in both table and graph form or repeated in the text. All tables must be numbered consecutively (in Arabic numbers). Place tables as close as possible to where they are mentioned in the main text. All Tables should be referred to in the text as Table 1, Table 2, etc.


Figures should be as small and simple as is compatible with clarity. The goal is for figures to be comprehensible to readers in other or related disciplines, and to assist their understanding of the paper. Figure legends should be typed in numerical order. Graphics should be prepared using applications capable of generating high resolution GIF, TIFF, JPEG or PowerPoint before pasting in the Microsoft Word manuscript file. Figures should be prepared in Microsoft Word. Use Arabic numerals to designate figures and upper case letters for their parts (Figure 1). Begin each legend with a title and include sufficient description so that the figure is understandable without reading the text of the manuscript. Information given in legends should not be repeated in the text.


Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

  1. The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  2. The submission file is in Microsoft Word (2003 or 2007) document file format.
  3. Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
    The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, which is found in About the Journal.
  4. The text is single-spaced; uses a 10-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  5. The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, which is found in About the Journal.
  6. If submitting to a peer-reviewed section of the journal, the instructions in Ensuring a Blind Review have been followed.

Copyright Notice

Submission of a manuscript implies: that the work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, or thesis) that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.
Creative Commons License
Scientific Journal by Eko Handayanto is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at


Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.


Author Fees

This journal charges the following author fees.

Processing Fee (Authors from Indonesia Only): 80.00 (USD)

If this paper is accepted for publication, you will be asked to pay an Article Processing Fee to cover processing costs.

No processing fee (free of charge) for authors from outside of Indonesia

If you do not have funds to pay such fees, you will have an opportunity to waive each fee. We do not want fees to prevent the publication of worthy work.

Indexed By